Legal Opinion

Akron Bar Ass'n v. Chandler

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 12, 1992No. 91-1765PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHerbert R. Brown, J.

This court finds that respondent violated the Disciplinary Rules in question. There is no question that drug trafficking poses a serious threat in today’s society. There is also no question that serious violations deserve serious sanctions. However, the board recognized that the root cause of respondent’s behavior was his substance dependency. We have difficulty finding that it is impossible for respondent to be rehabilitated from a chemical dependency.

We have noted an assumption among the bench and bar of Ohio that the sanction of indefinite suspension means a suspension for two years. This…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. SoucekOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. LevinOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. O'NeillOhio Supreme Court · 1988

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. BellOhio Supreme Court · 2024
  2. Akron Bar Ass'n v. ChandlerOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Akron Bar Assn. v. ChandlerOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. BellOhio Supreme Court · 2024
  5. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. ColumbroOhio Supreme Court · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API