Legal Opinion
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. O'Neill
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided November 16, 1988No. D.D. 88-13PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Per curiam
The record substantiates that respondent violated DR 1-102(A)(3) and 1-102(A)(4). Accordingly, we concur in the board’s findings and its recommendation. Respondent is hereby ordered indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, Douglas, Wright and H. Brown, JJ., concur.
2Cited by2 opinions
- Akron Bar Ass'n v. ChandlerOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. O'NeillOhio Supreme Court · 1989