Legal Opinion
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Soucek
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided May 25, 1988No. D.D. 87-27PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Per curiam
This court finds that respondent violated the Disciplinary Rules indicated by the board. However, we find the sanction recommended was not appropriate when compared to the misconduct committed. Accordingly, respondent is hereby ordered indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, Douglas and H. Brown, JJ., concur. Wright, J., dissents.
2Cited by5 opinions
- Akron Bar Ass'n v. ChandlerOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- In re CorriganOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. BellOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. WrightSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. WrightSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990