Legal Opinion

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Soucek

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 1988No. D.D. 87-27PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

This court finds that respondent violated the Disciplinary Rules indicated by the board. However, we find the sanction recommended was not appropriate when compared to the misconduct committed. Accordingly, respondent is hereby ordered indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, Douglas and H. Brown, JJ., concur. Wright, J., dissents.

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Akron Bar Ass'n v. ChandlerOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  2. In re CorriganOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. BellOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. WrightSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
  5. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. WrightSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990