Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Merrill v. Gerow

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided May 13, 1920PublishedCited by 23 opinions

A case of original jurisdiction.

1Opinion of the CourtBrowne, C. J.

An application for a writ in the nature of a quo warranto was instituted by J. Eugene Merrill against Daniel T. Gerow. The Attorney General refused to institute the proceedings in the name of the State and the claimant filed the information in 'his own behalf, setting up his claim. The petition set out in substance that Daniel T. Gerow has since the 20th of January, 1920, used and still uses without any warrant, charter or grant-the office of Chairman of the Republican State Executive *806Committee of Florida, “and is exercising the franchises, privileges and rights of said office, which said…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Newhouse v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. D'Alemberte v. State ex rel. MaysSupreme Court of Florida · 1908
  3. Roberts v. MarshallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. State ex rel. Attorney-General v. JonesSupreme Court of Florida · 1878
  5. Whitaker v. State Ex Rel. PierceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Gentry-Futch Co. v. GentrySupreme Court of Florida · 1925
  2. State Ex Rel. Johnson v. City of SarasotaSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
  3. State Ex Rel. Limpus v. NewellSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
  4. Attorney General Ex Rel. Taylor v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Florida · 1928
  5. State Ex Rel. Watkins v. FernandezSupreme Court of Florida · 1932

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API