State Ex Rel. Johnson v. City of Sarasota
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
Brown, C. J.,
(after stating the facts) :
The demurrer to the answer raises two primary questions: (1) Whether the description of the territorial limits is so indefinite as to render the act invalid, and (2) whether the act is rendered unconstitutional by including within the territorial limits some sixty-odd square miles of territory, many sections of which are sparsely or wholly uninhabited.
I. As to the first question, the charge of uncertainty is based on the description of the eastern boundary — especially by reason of the inclusion of the words indicated by italics in the following…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- City of Trenton v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Simmons Creek Coal Co. v. DoranSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- State v. BryanSupreme Court of Florida · 1905
- Kelly v. PittsburghSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Clark v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1900
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- State of Florida Ex Rel. Davis v. City of StuartSupreme Court of Florida · 1929
- State Ex Rel. Davis v. LoveSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
- McSween v. State Live Stock Sanitary BoardSupreme Court of Florida · 1929
- State Ex Rel. Attorney General v. City of Avon ParkSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
- State Ex Rel. Gore v. ChillingworthSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.