Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Watkins v. Fernandez

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided September 27, 1932PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTerrell, J.

This is an original proceeding in quo warranto ta test the right of the respondent, J. M. Fernandez, to exercise the functions, privileges; and title vested in him as nominee of the democratic party to the office of Constable for the third justice of the peace district of Hillsborough County. The cause is considered at this time on a motion to quash the information which raises the sole question of whether or not a nomination to office in this state can be tested by quo wiarranto.

It appears that relator and respondent were candidates for nomination to the office of constable for the third…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Relender v. State ex rel. UtzIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  2. State ex rel. Knott v. HaskellSupreme Court of Florida · 1916
  3. Jarman v. MasonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  4. State ex rel. Brooks v. FranshamMontana Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Snowball v. People ex rel. GrupeIllinois Supreme Court · 1893

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Adamowski v. WilsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
  2. State Ex Rel. Pooser v. WesterSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
  3. Harvard v. SingletarySupreme Court of Florida · 1999
  4. State Ex Rel. Scaldeferri v. SandstromSupreme Court of Florida · 1973
  5. State Ex Rel. West v. GraySupreme Court of Florida · 1954

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API