Legal Opinion

Dunning v. Rogers

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1879PublishedCited by 4 opinions

From the Monroe Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBiddle, J.

Proceedings supplementary to execution by the appellee, against Paris C. Dunning, Robert Foster and Milton Eight, to subject an indebtedness by promissory note, due to Dunning from Foster and Hight, to the payment of a judgment due from Dunning to the appellee. Hight and Foster answered separately that they were not indebted to Dunning, and Dunning answered that neither Hight nor Foster was indebted to him. Trial by jury; verdict for appellee; motion for a new trial overruled; judgment; appeal.

Assignment of errors:

1. The insufficiency of the complaint to constitute a ' cause of action ;

2.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lytle v. LytleIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Butler v. JaffrayIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
  3. Campbell v. CrossIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Brooks v. HarrisIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  5. Figg v. SnookIndiana Supreme Court · 1857

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Baker v. State ex rel. MillsIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Aurora National Bank v. BlackIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Fowler v. GriffinIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Conwell v. ConwellIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API