Legal Opinion

Figg v. Snook

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1857PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPEAL from the Montgomery Court of Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtDavison, J.

This was a suit instituted by Snook and Binford, who were the plaintiffs, to obtain satisfaction of a judgment. The proceeding is founded upon a statutory *203enactment which provides that, when an execution is returned unsatisfied, in whole or in part, and the judgment-creditor, after such return, files an affidavit with the clerk of any Court of record, &c., to the effect that the judgment-debtor has property, describing it, which he unjustly refuses to apply towards the satisfaction of the judgment, the Court shall issue an order requiring him to appear, &c., and on hearing the case, may order…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Morrison v. SempleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1813

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Burt v. HœttingerIndiana Supreme Court · 1867
  2. Fowler v. GriffinIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Jeffries v. SherburnIndiana Supreme Court · 1863
  4. Dowty v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Dunning v. RogersIndiana Supreme Court · 1879

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API