Legal Opinion

United States v. Koenig

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 19, 1991No. Nos. 89-50523, 89-50524, 89-50530, 89-50533 and 89-50547PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALLACE, Chief Judge:

Mark Koenig, Scott Koenig, Jacklyn Bobby, Robert Hussey and Bobbi Jo Bobby (conspirators), appeal their sentences, following guilty pleas to conspiracy to produce and use counterfeit access devices and various other crimes in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1029. The district court exercised jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3231. We have jurisdiction over these timely appeals pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.

I

Through his work as a computer consultant, Mark Koenig gained access to information regarding automated teller machine (ATM) transactions. This data, which was…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. Lucio MoralesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  2. United States v. Ronald v. CloudCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  3. United States v. Earl Thomas AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  4. United States v. Santiago Mares-MolinaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  5. United States v. Ronald Eugene DavisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. United States v. Pablo Rivera-SanchezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  2. United States v. SarkisianCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  3. United States v. Jose Alfredo Maldonado, AKA ChinoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. United States v. BlitzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  5. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael Devon LIPMAN, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API