Legal Opinion

Boldrick v. BTA Oil Producers

Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)

Decided March 22, 2007No. 11-06-00029-CVPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JOHN G. HILL, Justice (Assigned).

James P. Boldrick appeals from a final judgment that denied his summary judgment motion while granting the summary judgment motion of appellee BTA Oil Producers, a partnership. The judgment, among other things, declared that certain overriding royalty interests claimed by Boldrick are not payable to him until such time that nonconsent penalty provisions of a September 1973 joint operating agreement have been fully recouped by consenting parties and, accordingly, that BTA is not required to cause the payment of those overriding royalty interests until…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Valence Operating Co. v. DorsettTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Goswami v. Metropolitan Savings & Loan Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Seagull Energy E & P, Inc. v. Eland Energy, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Railroad Commission of Texas v. Olin Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1985
  5. Dorsett v. Valence Operating Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Indian Oil Company, LLC and William E. Trotter, II v. Bishop Petroleum, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API