Hawaii Corporation v. Kim
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Concurrence
CONCURRING OPINION OF
MARUMOTO, J.,
IN WHICH ABE, J., JOINS
I concur in the decision to affirm the judgment appealed from, but I disagree with the court’s reasoning in arriving at the decision.
I think that this case is governed solely by HRS § 103-25, without regard to any statement contained in the Special Notice to Bidders.
*667HRS § 103-25 disqualifies any prospective bidder, who has not given his written notice of intention to bid to the contracting officer not less than six days before the designated bid opening date, from submitting a bid for the contract for public work solicited in the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. LombardoSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Rogers v. City & County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 1933
- St. Louis Law Printing Co. v. AufderheideMissouri Court of Appeals · 1932
- Frank Nichols, Ltd. v. VannattaHawaii Supreme Court · 1935
- In the Matter of Eve M. CarlsonHawaii Supreme Court · 1948
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.