Legal Opinion

In the Matter of Eve M. Carlson

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided February 9, 1948No. 2685PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an appeal by the Real Estate Commission and its members, hereinafter referred to as “the respondents,” the appellee being Eve M. Carlson, an applicant for a real estate broker’s license, hereinafter referred to as “the petitioner.” The appeal is from the mandate of a circuit judge at chambers, directing the respondents to issue the license to the petitioner. The mandate is a peremptory one on the pleadings issued pursuant to Revised Laws of Hawaii 1945, section 10267.

The first of the two specifications of error challenges the circuit judge’s interpretation of the enactment dealing…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Whitcomb Hotel, Inc. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. State ex rel. Adams v. BurdgeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
  3. State v. Lancashire Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1899
  4. Honolulu Rapid Transit Co. v. WilderHawaii Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Territory of Hawaii v. Tue BunHawaii Supreme Court · 1910

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. McKnight v. State Land BoardUtah Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Puana v. SunnHawaii Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Hawaii Corporation v. KimHawaii Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Jacober v. SunnHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Hawaii Corporation v. KimHawaii Supreme Court · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API