Hance v. United States
District Court, W.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
*553DECISION AND ORDER
SKRETNY, District Judge.
Defendants bring this motion for summary judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56, on the grounds that this Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction because plaintiffs failed to present their claim brought pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act (the “Act”) to the appropriate federal agency within two years of its accrual, as required by the Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2401(b).
In support of the motion, defendants submit a memorandum of law with exhibits (“Defendants’ memo”), and a reply memorandum (“Defendants’ reply”). In opposition to the motion, plaintiffs submit…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Rattner v. NetburnCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Barrett v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.