Barrett v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CARDAMONE, Circuit Judge:
Today’s average citizen would doubtless be appalled, but probably not surprised, to learn that in the early 1950s, while conducting a chemical warfare experiment, the United States Army used certain individuals as test subjects. The experiment is shocking not because of its existence, but because the chemical tests were performed on these human guinea pigs without their consent. The individuals involved were not told that they were the subjects of an experimental and highly dangerous chemical warfare program. The case before us concerns one such subject who died after…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Flagg Bros., Inc. v. BrooksSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Martinez v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by175 opinions
- William Hohri v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
- Pearl v. City of Long BeachCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Bell v. City of MilwaukeeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Hopland Band of Pomo Indians v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Kronisch v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
170 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.