McConoughey v. Torrence
California Supreme Court
APPLICATION in the Supreme Court for mandamus to the Judge of the Superior Court of San Diego County, to compel the settlement of a statement on appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of that county. E. S. Torrence, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
This is a proceeding in mandamus to compel the respondent to settle a statement on appeal. The appeal was taken within sixty days after July 28, 1898. The refusal *331to settle the statement was made final and definite by an order of respondent made and entered October 11, 1898. This proceeding to compel settlement was not commenced until March 24, 1899, and the application must be denied upon the ground of laches. (Depeaux v. Peck, 118 Cal. 522.)
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Estate of DepeauxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
3Cited by26 opinions
- Lewis v. LewisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Sanguinetti v. SanguinettiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Simoneau v. Pacific Electric Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
- Farber v. OlkonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Goes v. PerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.