Legal Opinion

Farber v. Olkon

California Supreme Court

Decided March 17, 1953No. L. A. 22536PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.

Plaintiff, a mentally ill person appearing .by guardian ad litem, appeals from an adverse judgment entered upon a directed verdict in his action to recover damages from defendants for alleged bodily assault and negligence in administering an electroshock treatment to plaintiff. We have concluded that, contrary to plaintiff’s contention, the trial court’s determination that he was not entitled to the benefit of the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur was *505correct and that, although the evidence be viewed in the light most favorable to plaintiff and conflicts disregarded (see Huffman v. Lindquist…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ybarra v. SpangardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Huffman v. LindquistCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Pratt v. DavisIllinois Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Dierman v. Providence HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Engelking v. CarlsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Salgo v. Leland Stanford Jr. University Board of TrusteesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  2. Collins v. HandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  3. Bardessono v. MichelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Anderson v. SombergSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
  5. Bauer v. OtisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API