Legal Opinion

Oliver v. City of Raleigh

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 24, 1937PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaRNI-iill, J.

Ordinarily sidewalks are constructed for the use of pedestrians and public streets for vehicular travel, except at street intersections. This does not necessarily mean that a pedestrian is prohibited from using any portion of a street except at an intersection, or that a city in no event would be liable for injuries sustained by a pedestrian while traversing or walking upon a public street at a place other than an intersection. Each case must be determined upon its merits.

All portions of a public street from side to side and end to end are for the public use in the appropriate and proper…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kohlhof v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Mosseller v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  2. City of Tallahassee v. ColesSupreme Court of Florida · 1941
  3. Welling v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  4. Wallsee v. CAROLINA WATER COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  5. State v. MitchellSupreme Court of Vermont · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API