Oliver v. City of Raleigh
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBaRNI-iill, J.
Ordinarily sidewalks are constructed for the use of pedestrians and public streets for vehicular travel, except at street intersections. This does not necessarily mean that a pedestrian is prohibited from using any portion of a street except at an intersection, or that a city in no event would be liable for injuries sustained by a pedestrian while traversing or walking upon a public street at a place other than an intersection. Each case must be determined upon its merits.
All portions of a public street from side to side and end to end are for the public use in the appropriate and proper…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Kohlhof v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
3Cited by6 opinions
- Mosseller v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- City of Tallahassee v. ColesSupreme Court of Florida · 1941
- Welling v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Wallsee v. CAROLINA WATER COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- State v. MitchellSupreme Court of Vermont · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.