Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Mitchell

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided June 27, 1986No. 84-559Published

1DissentHayes, J.

I respectfully dissent. This case represents an unwarranted interference by the judicial branch with the prosecutor’s absolute power to dismiss a criminal charge prior to trial.

On January 18, 1984, defendant was issued a speeding ticket. He elected to have a jury trial and the jury was selected on September 17, 1984. Prior to the swearing of the jury, the State moved to dismiss the case with prejudice — something it had an absolute right to do. The trial judge then informed the deputy state’s attorney that if she dismissed the case, her office or the Winooski Police Department would have to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. ButlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Oliver v. . RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  3. Oliver v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API