Mosseller v. City of Asheville
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtLake, J.
The judgment of nonsuit must be sustained unless the evidence offered by the plaintiff, considered in the light most favorable to her, is sufficient to show negligence by the city which was the proximate cause of the plaintiff’s fall and injury. The burden is upon the plaintiff to establish such negligence and causation. Walker v. Wilson, 222 N.C. 66, 21 S.E. 2d 817.
When a municipal corporation operates a system of waterworks for the sale by it of water for private consumption and use, it is acting in its proprietary or corporate capacity and is liable for injury or damage resulting from such…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Fitzgerald v. Concord.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
- Carl v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1919
- Watkins v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- Smith v. City of HickorySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Bailey v. City of WinstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Fussell v. North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2010
- Fussell v. FARM BUREAU MUT. INS. CO.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2010
- Matternes v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- Frankenmuth Insurance v. City of HickoryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
- Bowling v. City of OxfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.