Legal Opinion
Holtzen v. Tulsa County Board of Adjustment
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided May 4, 2004No. 99,421Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON REHEARING
JERRY L. GOODMAN, Presiding Judge.
¶ 1 Defendant, Tulsa County Board of Adjustment, and Robert K. Bell Enterprises, Inc., appeal the trial court’s May 29, 2003, grant of summary judgment in favor of plaintiffs (Neighbors). The trial court’s judgment reversed the Board’s grant of a special exception for construction and operation of a roller coaster. This appeal was assigned to the accelerated docket pursuant to Oklahoma Supreme Court Rule 1.36(a)(1), 12 O.S.2001, ch. 15, app. 1. Based on the facts and applicable law, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.1
*1151UNDISPUTED…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Indiana National Bank v. State Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Sellers v. Oklahoma Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Young v. MacYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- Bankoff v. Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
- Nucholls v. Board of Adjustment of City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.