Bankoff v. Board of Adjustment
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
LAVENDER, Vice Chief Justice.
Rehearing is granted and opinion of this Court issued June 16, 1992 is WITHDRAWN.
SIMMS, HARGRAVE, OPALA and WATT, JJ., concur. SUMMERS, J., concurs in result. HODGES, C.J., and ALMA WILSON and KAUGER, JJ., concur in part, dissent in part. PER CURIAM:
Numerous issues are presented for our determination from these consolidated cases. Generalized and respectively considered they are: 1) whether a zoning amendment enacted after the first appeal was filed renders the denial of Appellee’s (Julius Bankoff) conditional use permit (CUP) and subsequent appeal of that…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Schultz v. PrittsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
- Bartlett v. American National Bank & Trust Co. of SapulpaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Burdick v. Independent School District No. 52Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- Allen v. State Ex Rel. Board of Trustees of the Oklahoma Uniform Retirement System for Justices & JudgesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- American Insurance Ass'n v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Blue Circle Cement, Inc. v. Board of County Commissioners of the County of RogersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Interstate Power Co. v. Nobles County Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Roberts v. Southwestern Bell Mobile Systems, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
- OSAGE NATION v. BD. OF COMMISSIONERS OF OSAGE COUNTY and OSAGE NATION v. OSAGE COUNTY BD. OF ADJUSTMENTSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
- Apache Corp. v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.