Legal Opinion

Freshkorn v. Marietta

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 5, 1942No. Appeals, 83-85PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Stern,

Paul Marietta, driving an automobile belonging to Joseph Fash, struck another car and injured its occupants. In the litigation which ensued Fash was absolved from liability, but three judgments were recovered by plaintiffs against Marietta and writs of attachment execution issued thereon against Pennsylvania Threshermen and Farmers’ Mutual Casualty Insurance Company. That company had executed a policy of accident liability insurance in favor of Fash containing an ex tended coverage clause which made the insurance available “to any person or persons while riding in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brower v. Employers' Liability Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  2. Laroche v. Farm Bureau Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. Martin v. LipschitzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  4. Gittelman v. Hoover CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Waters v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  2. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. De MaisonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
  3. Exner v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  4. Cherry v. MitoskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  5. Maryland Casualty Co. v. MarshbankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1955

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API