Legal Opinion
Littman v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 30, 1989No. 88 Civ. 3603 (MBM)PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
MUKASEY, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Gilbert Littman, claims that in discharging him defendant, Firestone Tire & Rubber Company (“Firestone”), discriminated against him on the basis of age in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 et seq. (1982) (ADEA) and on the basis of religion in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et seq. (1982) (Title VII). Plaintiff also contends that he was fired because he threatened to expose alleged racketeering activities of certain unnamed officers or employees of Firestone,…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Leibowitz v. Bank Leumi Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Young v. Schering Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
- Moche v. City University of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1992
- Blackburn v. United Parcel Service, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
- Falco v. Community Medical CenterNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.