Legal Opinion

Craig F. Weighall v. Diane Middle

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 1, 2000No. 99-35657PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McKEOWN, Circuit Judge:

Craig Weighall appeals the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. Weighall was convicted in Oregon state court of first degree assault for stabbing another man in a bar fight. At trial, he pursued a theory of self-defense and the jury was instructed on the permissible use of deadly force in self-defense. Weig-hall now maintains that his trial counsel’s failure to request an additional instruction to further clarify the defense constituted ineffective assistance of counsel. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm the district…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. United States v. FeolaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Tuan Van Tran v. Gary Lindsey, Warden Salinas Valley State Prisons State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. United States v. Kenneth E. HaddockCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Trenton Millender v. Stanley AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
  2. Joseph Sandgathe v. Manfred F. MaassCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  3. Freddy Leon Wildman v. Dan JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  4. Millender v. AdamsDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2002
  5. Ronald D. Baker v. City of Blaine Louanne CranefieldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API