Lachman v. Ottawa Circuit Judge
Michigan Supreme Court
Mandamus by Adam Lachman to compel Philip Padgham, circuit judge of Ottawa county, to vacate an order setting aside the action of a circuit court commissioner in indorsing upon a deed on foreclosure sale the redemption clause provided for by Act No. 200, Pub. Acts 1899.
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.
May 24, 1899, George A. Parr filed a bill, on the chancery side of the circuit court for the county of *28Ottawa, for the purpose of foreclosing a mortgage. The relator, who was the owner of a subsequent mortgage, was made a party to the bill. In August, 1899, a decree was granted authorizing a sale of the mortgaged premises any time after May 20, 1900. The decree contained the usual provisions of a chancery decree. On August 30th this decree was assigned by Mr. Farr to the relator. The commissioner sold the property under the decree July 24, 1900. Mr. Lachman bid for the land $1,435.65. Mr.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State Savings Bank v. MatthewsMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
- Gillam v. FosterMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
3Cited by2 opinions
- Farr v. LachmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
- Michigan Trust Co. v. LibbyMichigan Supreme Court · 1901