Legal Opinion

Farr v. Lachman

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 1902No. Docket No. 12Published

Appeal from Ottawa; Padgham, J. Bill by George A. Farr against Henry Lachman, Adam Lachman, and others to foreclose a mortgage. A decree of foreclosure was rendered, the property sold, and the sale confirmed. From, an order granting a writ of assistance on the application of John H. Tatem, defendants Lachman appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

The record bears out the following statement of facts, taken from the brief of the petitioner for writ of assistance:

*41On the 19th of August, A. D. 1899, a decree of foreclosure and sale was rendered by the circuit court for the county of Ottawa, in chancery, in the above-entitled cause. In pursuance thereof, said foreclosure sale was advertised by the commissioner in a notice signed by said commissioner, and countersigned by “Turner & ■ Turner, Solicitors,” and a sale of said premises was made by said commissioner on the 24th of July, 1900, to Gerald' Fitzgerald, for the sum of $1,500, as the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bigelow v. BoothMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Lachman v. Ottawa Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Wilber v. GoodrichMichigan Supreme Court · 1876

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API