State Savings Bank v. Matthews
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Wayne; Frazer, J. Bill by the State Savings Bank of Detroit against James N. Matthews, Jessie W. Radeliffe, and others, to foreclose a mortgage. A decree of foreclosure was rendered, and the request of defendant Radeliffe that it be entered under the provisions of Act No. 200, Pub. Acts 1899, being denied, she appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtMooke, J.
This is an appeal of a second mortgagee in possession from a decree of foreclosure of a real-estate mortgage authorizing a sale one month after decree entered, and providing that there shall be no redemption from such sale. The appellant appeared in the court below, and asked that a decree he entered providing for redemption according to the terms of Act No. 200 of the Public Acts of 1899. The sole questions are on the constitutionality and applicability of that act. The mortgage foreclosed was made in February, 1897, the bill of complaint was filed February 5, 1898, and the decree was…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Bank of Columbia v. OkelySupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Von Hoffman v. City of QuincySupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Bronson v. KinzieSupreme Court of the United States · 1843
- McCulloch v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Barnitz v. BeverlySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Lutz v. DutmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
- C. H. Little Co. v. L. P. Hazen Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1915
- Guardian Depositors Corp. v. PowersMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
- Hermanos v. H. C. Christianson & Co.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1918
- Grand River Avenue Christian Church v. Berkshire Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.