Legal Opinion
Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. Federal Power Commission
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided June 3, 1948No. 9588PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EDGERTON, Associate Justice.
This is a petition by Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company (“Panhandle”) under § 19(b) of the Natural Gas Act 1 to review orders of the Federal Power Commission authorizing Michigan-Wisconsin Pipe Line Company (“Michigan-Wisconsin”) to construct and operate a natural gas pipe line from a point in the Hugoton field in Hans-ford County, Texas, to the Austin storage field in Michigan, and also a branch line from a point in Illinois into Wisconsin, for the purpose of supplying natural gas to various communities in Wisconsin, Iowa, Missouri, and Michigan. Two…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. Pierce Auto Freight Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- National Labor Relations Board v. Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Kentucky Natural Gas Corp. v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1947
3Cited by25 opinions
- Northern Natural Gas Co. v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
- Michigan Consolidated Gas Co. v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1960
- Rural Electrification Administration v. Northern States Power CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
- Lynchburg Gas Company v. Federal Power Commission, Atlantic Seaboard Corporation, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
- Florida Economic Advisory Council v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.