Lynchburg Gas Company v. Federal Power Commission, Atlantic Seaboard Corporation, Intervenors
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Per curiam
The judgment of the court is that the order of the Commission under review in this proceeding is set aside and the case is remanded to the Commission for further proceedings. Judge Fahy states his reasons in an opinion in which Judge Washington concurs except Part II which discusses the contention of petitioner that the approved rate is an unreasonable restraint upon trade and is discriminatory in violation of the antitrust laws. Judge Washington files a separate concurring opinion in which Judge Fahy concurs except he believes a decision of .the antitrust issue would be appropriate. *944Judge…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. Philadelphia National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- White Motor Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Federal Communications Commission v. Sanders Bros. Radio StationSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Northern Natural Gas Co. v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
- Public Service Commission for the State of New York v. Federal Power Commission, Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- Mississippi Valley Gas Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People v. The Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
- GETTY OIL COMPANY (EASTERN OPERATIONS) v. RuckelshausDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1972
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.