Legal Opinion

Phil Bartlett v. Dr. David Coppe.

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided May 16, 2017No. 2016-221-Appeal. (WC 13-639)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice Robinson,

for the Court.

The plaintiffs, Phil and Natalie Bartlett, appeal pro se from the Superior Court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the defendant, Dr. David Coppe, in this medical malpractice action. This case came before the Supreme Court for oral argument on April 5, 2017, pursuant to an order directing the parties to appear and show cause why the issues raised in this appeal should not be summarily decided. After a close review of the record and careful consideration of the parties’ arguments (both written and oral), we are satisfied that cause has not been shown…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Lynch v. Spirit Rent-A-Car, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2009
  2. Sola v. LeightonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2012
  3. Tracie Peloquin, as Administratrix of the Estate of Pearl E. Archambault v. Haven Health Center of Greenville, LLCSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2013
  4. Riley v. StoneSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2006
  5. Great American E & S Insurance v. End Zone Pub & Grill of Narragansett, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2012

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Boghos Terzian v. James J. Lombardi, in his capacity as Treasurer for the City of ProvidenceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2018
  2. Brian Dockray v. Roger Williams Medical CenterSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API