Legal Opinion

United States v. Combe

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 23, 2013No. 12-4110Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

MARY BECK BRISCOE, Chief Judge.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist in the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is, therefore, submitted without oral argument.

Defendant Scott Combe appeals from the district court’s order denying his pro se motion to alter or amend the terms of an amended judgment imposing a six-month revocation sentence and a related thirty-month term of supervised release. Exercising jurisdiction pursuant to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dillon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  2. Ahmad v. FurlongCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  3. United States v. BroncheauCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011
  4. United States v. BroncheauDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2010
  5. United States v. CombeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API