Legal Opinion
Ahmad v. Furlong
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided January 18, 2006No. 04-1450PublishedCited by 99 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARTZ, Circuit Judge.
Appellants Mike Ehrmann, a corrections officer at Colorado’s Sterling Correctional Facility (SCF), and Robert Furlong, a former warden of the facility, appeal the district court’s refusal to decide whether they are entitled to qualified immunity on a claim under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000cc et seq. The district court held that it need not address the merits of the defense because their Amended Answer did not raise qualified immunity as a defense to the RLUIPA claim. Even accepting the district court’s view that the…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Gomez v. ToledoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Yvette Cruz v. Coach Stores, Inc., David Otani, William Betts, Diane Lewis, Sara Lee Corporation, and Herve HeriveauxCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Medina v. CramCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by99 opinions
- Kay v. BemisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Burke v. RegaladoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
- Sinclair Wyoming Refining v. A & B BuildersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2021
- McBeth v. HimesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Paugh v. Uintah CountyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2022
94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.