Legal Opinion
United States v. Combe
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided August 23, 2011No. 11-4063UnpublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
STEPHEN H. ANDERSON, Circuit Judge.
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist in the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Defendant and appellant Scott K. Com-be appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to clarify his supervised release terms and conditions. For the following reasons, we dismiss this appeal as not ripe for judicial review.
BACKGROUND
On November 2,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kansas Judicial Review v. StoutCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Sierra Club v. YeutterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Alto Eldorado Partnership v. County of Santa FeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- Clark v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. BroncheauCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. Von BehrenDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2014
- Burch v. Kansas, State ofDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2024
- United States v. CombeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. CombeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013