Legal Opinion
Sarkisian Bros. v. Hartnett
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 4, 1991PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMikoll, J.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (initiated in this court pursuant to Labor Law §§ 220 and 220-b) to review a determination of respondent which, inter alia, found that petitioners failed to pay prevailing wage and wage supplements.
The issue to be resolved in this CPLR article 78 proceeding is whether respondent properly determined that the construction and alteration of Sheldon Hall was a "public works” project within the meaning of and subject to the prevailing wage law (Labor Law § 220). We conclude that the determination is supported by substantial evidence. It should be confirmed…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Erie County Industrial Development Agency v. RobertsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Erie County Industrial Development Agency v. RobertsNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- 60 Market Street Associates v. HartnettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Vulcan Affordable Housing Corp. v. HartnettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
3Cited by7 opinions
- Feher Rubbish Removal, Inc. v. New York State Department of LaborAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Pyramid Co. v. HudacsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Pyramid Co. v. New York State Department of LaborAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Sarbro IX v. State New York Office of General ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- M.G.M. Insulation, Inc. v. GardnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.