Legal Opinion
United States v. Persinger
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided October 25, 1982No. Crim. 81-184PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DIAMOND, District Judge.
Presently before the court is the defendant’s motion to dismiss the above-captioned criminal action. The motion will be denied.
BACKGROUND
The defendant contends that the continuous custody article of the Interstate Agreement on Detainers, 18 U.S.C. App. at 360 (1982 Supp.) (IAD) requires that this action be dismissed because after he had been obtained from state custody for arraignment in the instant criminal proceeding he was returned to state custody before the case was tried.
The stipulated facts relevant to this motion may be stated as follows:
The defendant,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. MauroSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States of America Ex Rel. Frank Esola, 53517 v. Ronald M. Groomes, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Williams, Ronald Alfred, Ronald A. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Leroy SorrellCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- United States v. SorrellDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. Dale Scott HunnewellCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- Malone v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984