Legal Opinion

Donaldson v. Insurance Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 16, 1895PublishedCited by 14 opinions

FROM HAMILTON. Appeal from Chancery Court of Hamilton County. T. M. McConnell, Ch.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAlisteR, J.

This is a suit upon a policy of fire insurance. The Chancellor pronounced a decree in favor of complainant for the full amount of the policy. The company appealed, and has assigned errors. The policy, upon its face, insured the Kim-ball Town Company, as the owner of a certain hotel building, in a sum not exceeding fifteen hundred dollars, but the loss was made payable to W. E. Donaldson, receiver for the New York & New Orleans Coal & Iron Company, as his interest may appear at that time. The original bill is filed in the name of Donaldson, as receiver, against the insurance company, as…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cone v. . Niagara Fire Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  2. Fire Insurance Companies v. FelrathSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
  3. Hartford Fire Ins. v. DavenportMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance v. Germania Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Hammel v. Queen Insurance Co. of London & LiverpoolWisconsin Supreme Court · 1880

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Capital City Insurance v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
  2. American Indemnity Co. v. Southern Missionary CollegeTennessee Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Queen Ins. Co. of America v. Union Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1901
  4. German Fire Insurance Co. of Freeport v. Gibbs, Wilson & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1906
  5. Central National Insurance Co. of Omaha v. Manufacturers Acceptance Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1976

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API