Legal Opinion

Central National Insurance Co. of Omaha v. Manufacturers Acceptance Corp.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 1976PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BROCK, Justice.

This is an action to recover upon an insurance policy insuring against loss of a motorcycle by theft. The named insured, Robert L. Jackson, the owner of the motorcycle, is not a party to the action. Instead, the suit was brought by the Manufacturers Acceptance Corporation (MAC), appellee, in its capacity as chattel mortgagee of the motorcycle and as the “loss payee” named in the policy of insurance.

The defendant insuror, Central National Insurance Company of Omaha, appellant, defends upon two grounds, viz., (1) that MAC, as chattel mortgagee and the “loss payee” named in…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Green v. Fidelity-Phenix Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  2. Bird v. RailroadsTennessee Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Donaldson v. Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Reserve Insurance Company v. AguileraNebraska Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Coahoma County Bank & Trust Co. v. FeinburgMississippi Supreme Court · 1961

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. U.S. Bank, N.A. v. Tennessee Farmers Mutual Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Cox v. Tennessee Farmers Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2009
  3. Reeves v. Granite State Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Webb v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1984
  5. Pactech, Inc. v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2008

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API