Moore v. BD. OF ADJ. FOR CITY OF KINSTON
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Chief Judge.
The applicable section of the zoning ordinance reads in part: “The Neighborhood Trading District is established for the purposes of providing accessible business areas for residents to obtain goods and services.” Subsection (A) lists thirty-three permitted uses within the B-l district, including “[s]tores and shops conducting retail business.” Petitioner claims his flea market is included within the definition of stores and shops and is, therefore, a permitted use. We disagree.
Whether or not the flea market is a permitted use of property in the B-l district is a matter of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re Inquiry Concerning Judge HardySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- Woodhouse v. Bd. of Com'rs of Town of Nags HeadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Capricorn Equity Corp. v. Town of Chapel Hill Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
- Raleigh Place Associates v. City of RaleighCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
3Cited by4 opinions
- Morris Communications Corp. v. Board of Adjustment for GastoniaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
- Ball v. Randolph County Board of AdjustmentCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
- City of Lumberton v. U.S. Cold StorageCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
- Morris Communications Corp. v. Board of Adjustment for GastoniaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003