Legal Opinion

Ball v. Randolph County Board of Adjustment

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 21, 1998No. COA97-721PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALKER, Judge.

On 8 March 1996, the petitioners and adjoining owners both owned tracts of land located in a Residential Agricultural Zoning District (RA District) under the Randolph County Zoning Ordinance. The adjoining owners were granted a permit allowing the remediation of petroleum contaminated soil. Petitioners requested a determination from the Randolph County Director of Planning and Zoning (Director) that this activity should not be allowed as it is not listed as a permitted use in an RA District under the zoning ordinance. By letter dated 10 May 1996, the Director responded that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Coastal Ready-Mix Concrete Co. v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. CG&T Corp. v. Board of Adjustment of WilmingtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
  3. Mize v. County of MecklenburgCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  4. Moore v. BD. OF ADJ. FOR CITY OF KINSTONCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. JWL Investments, Inc. v. Guilford County Board of AdjustmentCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  2. North Iredell Neighbors for Rural Life v. Iredell CountyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  3. HEMPHILL NOLAN v. Town of WeddingtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  4. Philadelphus Presbyterian Found., Inc. v. Robeson Cnty. Bd. of Adjust.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API