Smith v. Ladrie
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtPowers, J.
The plaintiff furnished the defendant with flour for use in his bakery business under a consignment contract by the terms of which title to the flour remained in the plaintiff, and the defendant was required to pay for it before he used it.' The defendant used 18 barrels of this flour without paying for it. Shortly after, he went into bankruptcy, scheduled this claim as a liability, and in due course was discharged. The plaintiff did not prove his claim or take any part in the bankruptcy proceedings. He brought this tort action in the form of trover, and the defendant answered his discharge…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Tinker v. ColwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- McIntyre v. KavanaughSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Wellman v. MeadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1919
- In re CoteSupreme Court of Vermont · 1918
- Mason v. SaultSupreme Court of Vermont · 1919
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Vermont Acceptance Corp. v. WiltshireSupreme Court of Vermont · 1931
- Manley Brothers Co., Inc. v. SomersSupreme Court of Vermont · 1927
- Money Corporation v. DraggooMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
- Reed v. RowellSupreme Court of Vermont · 1926
- Jewett v. PudloSupreme Court of Vermont · 1934
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.