Legal Opinion
Money Corporation v. Draggoo
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided March 2, 1936No. Docket No. 30, Calendar No. 38,638PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtButzel, J.
Among the assets taken over by plaintiff Money Corporation from another loan and investment company were two notes of defendant, dated August 13, 1932. Each contained a clause stating that it was secured by an automobile fully described; that the title therein was in the payee of the note; that upon default, the payee had the right to retake the property; that “the said property shall not be removed from S. Gr. Draggoo in the city of Muskegon, ’ ’ etc. Each note was filed in the office of the city clerk of Muskegon and had annexed to it the affidavit required by 3 Comp. Laws 1929, § 13424, in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Davis v. Aetna Acceptance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
- McIntyre v. KavanaughSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Kreitlein v. FergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Brown v. GareyNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
- Baker v. Bryant Fertilizer Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1921
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- American Surety Co. v. McKiearnanMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
- Peerson v. MitchellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
- Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance v. LineberryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
- Wayne Creamery v. ClementsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
- Csatari v. General Finance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1949
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.