Legal Opinion

Williams v. Dark

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 7, 1993No. Civ. A. 93-2232PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

KATZ, District Judge.

AND NOW, this 7th day of September, 1993, upon consideration of Defendant William P. James’ Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief Can Be Granted Or, in the Alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment, and the response, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant James’ Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED for the following reasons:

I. Facts

Plaintiff, Terrance Williams (“Plaintiff’ or “Williams”), filed a pro se civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Leon O. Dark, Manager of Court Reporting Services for the Court of Common Pleas…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Polk County v. DodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Brown v. TucciDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. Thomason v. LehrerDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
  3. Taylor v. CoxDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Muhammad v. HilbertDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Frazier v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API