Legal Opinion
Taylor v. Cox
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided December 27, 1995No. 2:95-cv-03533PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM and ORDER
ANITA B. BRODY, District Judge.
Before me for disposition is the “Motion to Dismiss of Commonwealth Defendants”, filed by defendants Cox, Bums and Womack. For the following reasons, defendants’ mo tion will be denied in part and granted in part.
I. BACKGROUND
Pro se plaintiff Taylor is an inmate presently incarcerated at SCI-Huntington. On May 3, 1995, plaintiff was temporarily transferred from SCI-Huntington to SCI-Grater-ford for purposes of a parole violation hearing. Plaintiff alleges that upon his transfer to SCI-Graterford, certain legal and religious materials were…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Bounds v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- CAMPITELLI v. PLYMOUTH ROCK ASSURANCE CORPORATIONDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
- IVY v. WETZELDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
- KELLY v. The Jonus Group, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
- SHANER v. RUSSELLDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020