Legal Opinion
Ex Parte Navarijo
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Decided June 18, 2014No. WR-79,286-01PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court 1
OPINION
2Opinion of the Court · AlcalaAlcala, J.
in which KELLER, P.J., MEYERS, KEASLER, HERVEY, and COCHRAN, JJ., joined.
To establish that he is actually innocent of an offense of which he has previously been convicted, an individual seeking post-conviction relief on that basis must demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that no reasonable juror would have convicted him in light of the new evidence. Although Frank Navarijo, applicant, has provided some new evidence in support of his claim that he is actually innocent of the offense of aggravated sexual assault of a child, we conclude that he has failed to meet this standard…
3Cases cited8 opinions
- Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Ex Parte TuleyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
- Ex parte WeinsteinCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2014
- Ex Parte BrownCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006
- Flores, Ex Parte GerardoCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by29 opinions
- Ex parte FournierCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2015
- EX PARTE Roberto Gonzalez DE LA CRUZ, ApplicantCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2015
- Ex parte KussmaulCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2018
- Ex parte MooreCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2018
- Ex parte VasquezCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.