Legal Opinion

Estate of Cirone

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 27, 1987No. H001577PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CAPACCIOLI, J.

—The pivotal issue in this case is whether a restriction in the 1985 Budget Act line-item appropriation for payment of attorney fee awards made pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5, 1 which limits expenditures to a maximum hourly rate of recovery, violates California Constitution’s separation of powers doctrine (Cal. Const., art. Ill, § 3). We conclude it does not and reverse.

I

Procedural History

“[Jessie] Cirone died at about 2 p.m. on June 8, 1982. The inheritance tax referee appointed by the probate court reported that Cirone’s estate owed a tax of $70,108.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Serrano v. UnruhCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Press v. Lucky Stores, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Committee to Defend Reproductive Rights v. MyersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Mandel v. MyersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Imperial Irrigation District v. State Water Resources Control BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  2. Imp. Irrig. Dist. v. St. Wat. Resources Ctrl.California Court of Appeal · 1990
  3. California Labor Federation v. Occupational Safety & Health Standards BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API