Martin v. Texas & N. O. R.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
CODY, Justice.
This is a suit by appellant to recover for injuries to his person and to his automobile, resulting when his car and one of ap-pellee’s switch engines collided at night at a crossing in Houston. The case was submitted on special issues which, as answered by the jury, convicted appellee of negligence in one respect, while convicting appellant of negligence in eight respects. But the jury also found the issues on discovered peril in appellant’s favor, which, if the evidence sustained the answers, of course rendered appellant competent to recover judgment, though convicted of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Houston Transit Co. v. FelderTexas Supreme Court · 1948
- Turner v. Texas Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1942
- Felder v. Houston Transit Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1947
3Cited by15 opinions
- RT Herrin Petroleum Transport Co. v. ProctorTexas Supreme Court · 1960
- Texas & New Orleans Ry. Co. v. HartTexas Supreme Court · 1962
- Ragsdale v. LindseyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
- Texas and Pacific Railway Company v. MeeksCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
- Waldeck v. WattsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.