Waldeck v. Watts
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
POPE, Justice.
The failure of the trial court to submit plaintiffs’ requested issues on the last clear chance is assigned as error. The jury found that the defendant’s employee was negligent but that the plaintiff was con- tributarily negligent in an intersection collision. Judgment was for the defendant.
Mrs. Thelma L. Waldeck, plaintiff, was proceeding east along Seeling Boulevard in San Antonio at ten o’clock in the morning on a clear day. D. U. Stroud, an employee of defendant, Hollis Watts, d/b/a Hollis Watts Company, was proceeding south along St. Cloud Road. Mrs. Waldeck was on his right…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ford v. Panhandle & Santa Fe Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1952
- Parks v. Airline Motor Coaches, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1946
- Whited v. PowellTexas Supreme Court · 1956
- Schumacher Co. v. PoseyTexas Supreme Court · 1948
- Texas & N. O. Ry. Co. v. WagnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- RT Herrin Petroleum Transport Co. v. ProctorTexas Supreme Court · 1960
- Searcy v. SellersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
- RT Herrin Petroleum Transport Co. v. ProctorTexas Supreme Court · 1960
- Texas and Pacific Railway Company v. MeeksCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
- Texas and Pacific Railway Company v. MeeksCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960