Jones v. Continental Casualty Co.
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Plaintiff was injured in a collision between the motorcycle he was operating and a construction vehicle insured by defendant. He filed suit, claiming personal protection benefits under the no-fault insurance act, MCL 500.3105; MSA 24.13105. Plaintiff now appeals as of right from an order denying his motion for summary disposition and entering judgment in favor of defendant. We reverse and remand.
The trial judge ruled that plaintiff was not entitled to personal protection benefits under § 3105 because the vehicle insured by defendant was not a "motor vehicle” within the meaning of the statute.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lee v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
- Schanz v. New Hampshire InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
- Apperson v. Citizens Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
- Coffey v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
3Cited by7 opinions
- Blase v. AppicelliMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
- Dowdle v. Miss. Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1997
- Joyce v. VemulapalliMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. American Community Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
- In re Murray EstateMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.