Legal Opinion

Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. Hart

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 6, 1988No. 367, September Term, 1987PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BISHOP, Judge.

Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company (Nationwide) appeals from an Order of the Circuit Court for Baltimore County (DeWaters, J.), which denied its request for an interlocutory injunction and its motion for partial summary judgment. Nationwide raises two questions:

I. Whether the lower court erred when, relying solely on a Georgia case and without any consideration of controlling Maryland law, it found that Nationwide’s restrictive employment covenant could not be enforced and, therefore, denied the request for an interlocutory injunction? and

II. Whether this Court should exercise…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Reuben Palmer v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
  2. Marathon Oil Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  3. Department of Transportation v. ArmacostCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  4. State v. FickerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
  5. Ruhl v. F. A. Bartlett Tree Expert Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1967

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Colandrea v. Wilde Lake Community Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  2. Padco Advisors, Inc. v. OmdahlDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2002
  3. Owens Corning v. WalatkaCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  4. Washington Mutual Bank v. HomanCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2009
  5. M. Leo Storch Ltd. Partnership v. Erol's, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API