Legal Opinion
Department of Transportation v. Armacost
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided May 1, 1984No. 153, September Term, 1983PublishedCited by 92 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURPHY, Chief Judge.
This case concerns the propriety of granting an interlocutory injunction delaying the implementation in Carroll County of Maryland’s Vehicle Emissions Inspection Program (VEIP).
I
The VEIP is one part of Maryland’s overall effort to reduce air pollution within its borders. It is a segment of the national air pollution control scheme provided for by the federal Clean Air Act, codified as 42 U.S.C. §§ 7401-7642. Under the authority conferred by that legislation, the federal Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has established uniform national ambient air quality standards for…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by92 opinions
- Murphy v. EdmondsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
- United States v. Cyrus Jonathan GeorgeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
- Little v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
- Schisler v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- Fogle v. H & G Restaurant, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.